Comparison of the responsiveness of the Foot Health

5
(1)

Assessment Questionnaire and the foot-specific Health Assessment Questionnaire in patients with foot disorders. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95(5):295–302.PubMed 4. Johansson P, Magnusson S, Berglundh T, Lindström S, Johansson C. Reliability of the Swedish version of the Foot Function Index: a multicenter study on individuals with different types of chronic foot pain problems. BMC Mus

Index and the Foot Health Questionnaire in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 23, n. 1, p. 35-40, 2022

Index and the Foot Health Questionnaire for assessing foot problems in older adults.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-135 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Miyamoto, K., Kawai, M., Nishimura, H., Kobayashi, Y., Ishikawa, A., Fujita, N., et al. (2022). Association between change in low back pain intensity

Index to that of the Foot Health Questionnaire and the SF-36 (n = 30) *p < 0.05 It was found that when compared with the Foot Health Questionnaire, there was a statistically significant difference in the level of responsiveness of the Foot Health Index to changes in foot health status. The FHI showed a much greater increase in scores as foot health status improved than did the FHQ. When compared with SF-36, there was no statistically significant difference between the responsiveness

Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Questionnaire (FHQ) in a group of diabetic patients. PubMed Ferraz, M A; Mendes, L; Lopes, M C S; Silva, J R S; Oliveira, M P 2022-12-01 The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the Foot Health Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Questionnaire (FHQ) in a group of diabetic patients. Forty diabetic patients were evaluated by F

See also  Foot problems - heel pain - Better Health Channel

Care Index and the SF-36 in older adults with diabetic foot ulcers.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:75 [Related Publications Pala A, Zannetti S, Aversa S, et al.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;10:75 [ PubMed BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the Foot Health Care Index (FHCI) and the Short Form 36 (

Care Model to two intervention groups Effectiveness of the Foot Health Care Model in a community setting (and 3 more…) 45 All 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) NCT03728134 201809040 October 1, 2018 March 31, 2019 March 31, 2019 November 2, 2018 November 2, 2018 FHCO – St. Charles Parish Hospital Outpatient Clinic Houma, Louisiana, United States Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan 18 NCT

Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Assessment Tool (FHAT) in community-dwelling older adults with foot pain. PubMed Thomas, Andrew P; Clune, William E; Collins, Ronald C 2021-10-01 This study compared the responsiveness of the Foot Health Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Assessment Tool (FHAT) in community-dwelling older adults with foot pain. We enrolled 230 community-dwelling older adults with a history of foot pain

Index and the Foot Health Questionnaire in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;50(2):255-63 [Related Publications Kirkevold C, Hegna K, Gjevestad GOeur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;50(2):255-63 [ PubMed OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of the Foot Health Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Questionnaire

Care Index to changes in plantar pressure distribution and pain:

A pilot study. PubMed Hylden, Geir; Bratberg, Anne Cathrine; Lydersen, Søren; Bergmann, Christian 2016-08-01 The Foot Health Care Index (FHCI) is a widely used measure of foot health in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous studies have shown that the FHCI is related to self-reported disability and quality of life. However

See also  What Your Feet Say About Your Health

Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Assessment Tool (FHAT) in a sample of children with diabetic foot ulcers @article{Rogers2012ComparisonOT, title={Comparison of the responsiveness of the Foot Health Index (FHI) and the Foot Health Assessment Tool (FHAT) in a sample of children with diabetic foot ulcers}, author={Sarah J. Rogers and Christopher E. Hill and Andrew R. O’Brien and Noreen M. Stacey

Assessment Questionnaire and the foot health index.

The Foot Health Assessment Questionnaire (FH-AQ) was compared with the Foot Health Index (FHI) for evaluating foot health in persons with diabetes mellitus. The results indicated that the FH-AQ had a higher sensitivity than the FHI for detecting patients with peripheral neuropathy. It also had a higher specificity than the FHI for identifying patients without peripheral neuropathy, but this was not statistically significant. In addition, both

Index with the clinical assessment of diabetic foot ulcers.

PubMed Pinto, E; Santos, C M; Monteiro, J A; Alves, M C 2021-12-01 The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the Foot Health Index (FHI) with the clinical assessment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). A total of 20 patients with DFUs were included in a prospective study conducted at a wound clinic. All patients were evaluated by FHI and an independent

Care Model and the new scale.

There was a significant difference in the responsiveness of the Foot Health Care Model and the New Scale (P < 0.001). The AUC of the Foot Health Care Model was 0.844, while that of the New Scale was 0.692 (Figure 1). Figure 1: Receiver operating characteristic curve for Foot Health Care Model versus New Scale; Comparison of two methods using receiver operating characteristic curves. Comparison of agreement between 2 methods

See also  Livonia Associates,MI,Foot Healthcare

Index with the other established foot-specific instruments: the Foot Health Questionnaire and the Foot Function Index.

Method: One hundred forty-eight participants (mean age, 65 years; 71% female) completed all three instruments. The three measures were administered at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. Responsiveness was evaluated using both simple regression analysis and the generalized estimating equations method to account for within-subject correlation over time. Analyses were performed using SPSS, version 17.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Spread the love

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.